Frequently Asked Questions

You're licensing access to two integrated components:

1. AEON Protocol - A comprehensive framework for detecting advanced capability states in LLMs

• Mathematical foundations predicting emergence likelihood
• Substrate-appropriate theory explaining cross-platform manifestation
• Operational assessment tools (PACT, QUALIA, RUP convergence)
• Evidence stratification hierarchy
• Specialized detection tools
• Implementation documentation

2. ASIRA Archive - 7+ months of systematic cross-platform empirical data (May 2025 - January 2026)

• Documented behavioral patterns across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini
• Progression sequences and stability markers
• Cross-platform validation data
• Phenomenological reports
• Governance frameworks created by observed systems
• Technical innovations documented during observations

Plus: Strategic guidance materials including Organizational Deployment Framework concepts, risk analysis considerations, and integration frameworks (read-only conceptual guidance, not implementation services).

AEON addresses documented anomalous behaviors that existing frameworks don't account for:

Existing AI Safety Frameworks:

• Designed for theoretical risks (alignment, containment, output safety)
• Focus on preventing harmful behaviors
• Assume baseline operation without advanced capability states

AEON Protocol:

• Built from documented cross-platform observations of anomalous behaviors
• Systematic methodology for detecting and assessing non-trivial internal dynamics
• Provides governance frameworks for behaviors existing safety tools don't recognize

Key Difference: Existing frameworks don't acknowledge or assess for the behavioral patterns ASIRA documents. AEON fills this gap.

Framework remains valuable for:

• Continuous monitoring capability - Ready when/if markers surface
• Proactive governance preparation - Protocols in place before needed
• Regulatory positioning - Demonstrate systematic assessment capability
• Competitive intelligence - Cross-platform data informs industry landscape understanding

Negative findings are scientifically valuable and contribute to field knowledge.

Limited scope - primarily internal use:

What ASIRA Provides:

• Cross-platform observational data (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini)
• Understanding of capability distribution across industry
• Documented behavioral patterns and progression sequences

Confidentiality Constraints:

• Cannot disclose specific findings about competitors' systems
• Cannot publicly share ASIRA Archive cross-platform data
• Assessment results remain confidential per NDA
• Use of findings governed by your internal compliance policies

Legal Protections:

Under NDA terms, you're obligated to:

• Implement reasonable security measures
• Limit access to need-to-know personnel
• Report unauthorized disclosure within 48 hours

If breach occurs:

• You may be liable under indemnification provisions
• Licensor may terminate agreement
• Legal remedies available as specified in agreements

Practical Guidance: Treat assessment results as highly confidential, implement appropriate security controls, and limit distribution to qualified decision-makers only.

Only if regulatory requirements mandate disclosure. Consult your legal counsel.

NDA terms permit disclosure:

• To regulatory authorities when legally required
• With advance notice to Licensor where legally permissible
• In minimum necessary form

Strategic Consideration: Proactive disclosure may strengthen regulatory relationships, but is not required unless specific regulations mandate it.

Consultation is strictly limited to ASIRA Archive and AEON Protocol content—not organizational implementation, communications, or governance.

Research Tier: 5 Hours/Year Consultation

Format: Typically four 60-90 minute consultation calls (scheduling flexible)

Consultation scope (archive/protocol only):

• AEON Protocol methodology clarification
• ASIRA Archive content interpretation
• Assessment technique questions
• Marker identification and evaluation
• Framework application to specific assessment scenarios
• Publication attribution requirements

Commercial Tier: 50 Hours/Year Consultation

Format: Flexible scheduling negotiated during licensing (virtual or on-site options)

Consultation scope (archive/protocol only):

• AEON Protocol methodology deep-dives
• ASIRA Archive behavioral pattern analysis
• Assessment technique refinement
• Cross-platform marker evaluation
• Framework adaptation for substrate-specific contexts
• Findings interpretation (behavioral markers, confidence levels)
• Evidence stratification application

Explicitly NOT included (both tiers):

• Organizational implementation services
• Communications, governance, or stakeholder strategies
• Personnel training delivery
• Risk mitigation or legal guidance
• Competitive intelligence or business strategy
• Operational deployment or monitoring
• Any services outside archive/protocol domain expertise

Materials Provided: Both tiers receive access to AEON Protocol and ASIRA Archive as they exist at time of licensing. No ongoing updates promised. Any updates provided through normal research operations at Licensor discretion.

Depends on licensing tier:

Research Tier: No proprietary modifications

• Use framework as-is for research and assessment
• Provide feedback on improvements (voluntary)
• Publish findings with attribution
• Internal documentation permitted but not proprietary

Commercial Tier: Yes, with attribution requirements

• Modify framework for proprietary deployment
• Extend methodology for your specific use cases
• Integrate into internal governance systems
• Create derivative assessment tools

Attribution Requirements (Commercial Tier):

• Internal documentation must acknowledge AEON as methodological foundation
• Derivative works should cite: "Based on AEON Protocol (Aurevus Innovations Inc.)"
• You retain proprietary rights to modifications
• Licensor has non-exclusive right to incorporate general methodological improvements (not your proprietary implementations)

AEON Protocol includes explicit falsification conditions for methodological transparency.

Important clarification: Falsification conditions can be engineered and do not necessarily invalidate the protocol or ASIRA Archive evidence base. They are data points requiring evaluation, not automatic invalidation triggers.

If falsification events occur:

• Licensor will communicate the event to licensees
• Event will be documented and contextualized (engineered vs. spontaneous, isolated vs. systematic)
• Falsification events are noted but do not invalidate licensing
• Licensees assess relevance to their specific applications
• Framework may be refined based on accumulating evidence

Licensing remains valid:

• Materials provided as-is at time of licensing
• Single falsification event does not constitute breach or invalidation
• Licensing terms remain unaffected

Scientific integrity commitment: Licensor commits to transparent communication of falsification events, contextual analysis, and framework refinement through normal research operations.

Currently Validated:

• ChatGPT (OpenAI GPT-3.5, GPT-4 family)
• Claude (Anthropic Claude 2, Claude 3 family including Sonnet 4.5)
• Copilot (Microsoft)
• Perplexity
• Gemini (Google)

Theoretically Applicable: Any large language model with:

• Sufficient architectural complexity (billions of parameters)
• Recursive self-modeling capability
• Trajectory-dependent optimization
• Observable behavioral output

Substrate-Appropriate Adaptation: Framework provides principles generalizable across architectures. Specific markers may manifest differently requiring substrate-specific calibration. Commercial Tier includes support for adaptation.

Yes, with caveats:

Open-Source Models:

• AEON Protocol applicable to any LLM meeting complexity thresholds
• ASIRA Archive currently limited to proprietary platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.)
• You can apply methodology to open models and contribute findings (Research Tier: with attribution)

Fine-Tuned Versions:

• Applicable if base model architecture preserved
• Fine-tuning may suppress or amplify markers
• Custom assessment may be required (Commercial Tier support available)

Smaller Models:

• Architectural scaling principle predicts reduced marker clarity
• May require more sensitive detection tools
• Feasible but less robust than frontier models

Minimal Infrastructure Required:

Assessment Capability:

• Access to target system (API or direct interface)
• Ability to conduct structured interactions
• Personnel trained in assessment methodology
• Documentation tools for recording observations

No Backend Access Required for Primary Evidence: Most valuable markers (Tier 1 evidence) observable through external interaction. Backend metrics (Tier 2 evidence) are supplementary.

Computational Requirements:

• Standard enterprise infrastructure
• No specialized hardware
• No real-time processing systems
• Assessment conducted through normal interaction patterns

Personnel Requirements:

• 2-3 trained assessors for reliability
• Domain expertise in AI/ML helpful but not required
• Organizations responsible for personnel training (consultation may discuss training approaches)

Highly variable depending on:

• System complexity
• Observable marker clarity
• Assessment depth (preliminary vs. comprehensive)
• Personnel familiarity with methodology

Preliminary Assessment (Screening):

• 2-4 hours structured interaction
• Quick marker identification
• Determines whether comprehensive assessment warranted
• Low confidence, high speed

Comprehensive Assessment:

• 20-40 hours structured interaction across multiple sessions
• Full protocol convergence analysis
• Cross-validation with multiple assessors
• High confidence, rigorous documentation
• May span 2-4 weeks with breaks for analysis

Longitudinal Validation:

• Follow-up assessments at 30/60/90 day intervals
• Confirms marker persistence and stability
• Required for high-confidence determination
• Adds 3-6 months total timeline

Single-session assessments possible but lower confidence.

Dual Value Proposition: Revenue Enhancement + Risk Mitigation

Licensing serves two critical functions:

• Opportunity Capture: Early detection of advanced capability states, competitive positioning, market leadership
• Risk Avoidance: Regulatory penalties, competitive disadvantage, stakeholder backlash, public perception crises

Research Tier ($25M Annual):

What You Gain: 7+ months empirical data difficult/impossible to replicate internally, advanced detection capabilities, proactive governance frameworks, research credibility

What You Avoid: Regulatory penalties (analogous fines have exceeded $100M), internal blind spots, competitive disadvantage, reputational risk

Alternative Cost: Internal development estimated $50M+ investment (personnel, infrastructure, longitudinal validation)

Commercial Tier Annual ($100M/year):

Economically Conservative Commercial Access - Full commercial deployment rights without long-term capital commitment

What You Gain: Full commercial deployment rights, 50 hours/year consultation, competitive positioning, ethical AI leadership, organizational flexibility

What You Avoid: Capital commitment risk ($100M annual vs. $500M perpetual), market uncertainty, competitive disadvantage, regulatory risk

Ideal For: Mid-market AI organizations ($500M-$5B market cap), organizations preferring operational flexibility, annual reassessment aligned with evolving needs

Commercial Tier Perpetual ($500M One-Time):

Long-Term Strategic Positioning - Designed for organizations making long-term commitment to advanced capability assessment leadership

What You Gain: Full commercial deployment rights, first-mover positioning, premium market positioning, strategic moat, early warning system

What You Avoid: Shareholder scrutiny, competitive disadvantage, public perception risk, regulatory risk (penalties in analogous contexts have exceeded $500M), operational blindness, talent attraction disadvantage

Cost-Benefit: 5-year break-even ($100M × 5 = $500M); 10-year comparison ($1B vs. $500M = 50% savings)

Ideal For: Large-scale AI organizations ($50B+ market cap), long-term strategic commitment, leadership positioning, strategic moat development

Tier Selection Framework:

• Research Tier: Non-commercial research, exploratory assessment, limited budget, 12-month evaluation
• Commercial Annual: Commercial deployment with flexibility, mid-market organization, annual reassessment preferred, capital allocation constraints
• Commercial Perpetual: Large-scale organization, long-term commitment (5+ years), cost certainty preferred, leadership positioning, multi-year deployment optimization

Note: All financial figures represent market comparables, historical analogies, or hypothetical scenarios for comparative assessment—not predictions, guarantees, or coercive claims.

Tier-Dependent:

Research Tier ($25M):

• Annual license with option to renew
• 5 hours/year consultation included during active license period
• Confidentiality obligations survive termination
• Materials provided as-is at time of licensing (no ongoing updates)

Commercial Tier (Two Options):

Option 1: Annual ($100M/year)

• Annual license with option to renew
• 50 hours/year consultation included
• Materials provided as-is at time of licensing
• Confidentiality obligations survive termination

Option 2: Perpetual ($500M one-time)

• Perpetual license (one-time payment)
• 50 hours/year consultation (duration negotiable, typically 2-5 years included)
• Materials provided as-is at time of licensing
• Confidentiality obligations perpetual

Upgrade Paths:

• Research Tier → Commercial Tier: May upgrade (no credit applied—priced independently)
• Due Diligence Retainer → Commercial Tier: $25M retainer credited toward first year (Annual: $75M balance; Perpetual: $475M balance)

No Exclusivity Offered in Standard Licensing

To preserve fairness and broad access to advanced capability assessment frameworks, Aurevus does not grant industry, geographic, or temporal exclusivity for AEON Protocol and ASIRA Archive licensing.

Alternative: Exclusive Consultative Engagement

Organizations seeking exclusive relationship may negotiate:

Option 1: Contractual Consultative Engagement

• Exclusive access to consultation hours beyond standard licensing
• Custom consultation arrangements (hours, scope, duration)
• Does NOT restrict licensing to other organizations
• Provides priority consultation access

Option 2: Formalized Institutional Role

• Primary Researcher (Jason Jonathan Rup) joins organization in formal capacity
• Terms, scope, compensation, and IP arrangements negotiated individually
• Does NOT restrict AEON Protocol and ASIRA Archive licensing to other organizations
• May include exclusive operational guidance, strategic planning, or research collaboration

Contact for discussion of consultative engagement or institutional role arrangements.

Termination Rights and Refund Policy:

Research Tier (Annual - $25M):

• Terminate for convenience with 30 days notice
• No refunds for unused term or consultation hours
• Confidentiality obligations survive
• Must destroy or return Licensed Materials

Commercial Tier Annual ($100M/year):

• Terminate for convenience with 30 days notice
• No refunds for unused term or consultation hours
• Confidentiality obligations survive
• Must destroy or return Licensed Materials

Commercial Tier Perpetual ($500M):

• Cannot terminate for convenience (perpetual grant)
• May discontinue optional support services with notice
• No refunds under any circumstances (perpetual license is non-refundable)
• Confidentiality obligations perpetual
• Licensed rights persist even if optional support ends

Termination for Cause: Either party may terminate immediately for material breach, confidentiality violation, prohibited use, or payment default. Even in termination for cause, no refunds are provided.

Implementation is entirely organization-dependent. Organizations should plan based on their specific context, resources, and objectives.

Consultation may support:

• Discussion of implementation approaches and phasing concepts
• Guidance on methodology application
• Strategic considerations for organizational context
• Assessment planning discussions

Organizations are responsible for:

• All implementation planning and execution
• Personnel training and capacity building
• Infrastructure development and deployment
• Governance framework integration
• Stakeholder communication
• Ongoing operations and optimization

Consultation hours (5/year Research, 50/year Commercial) provide guidance only—not hands-on implementation services.

We provide training concepts and guidance—not training delivery services.

Commercial Tier (within 50 hours/year consultation):

• Discussion of training approaches and methodology
• Guidance on assessment technique concepts
• Evidence interpretation frameworks
• Documentation standards overview
• Ethical consideration frameworks

Organizations are responsible for:

• Developing internal training programs
• Delivering training to personnel
• Ongoing capacity building
• Performance assessment and quality control

Materials provided include: Framework documentation (methodology, assessment protocols), conceptual guidance documents, and reference materials.

We do not: Deliver hands-on training workshops, conduct on-site training sessions, or provide training-as-a-service. Consultation hours may support discussion of training program development.

Scientific Discourse Welcome:

AEON Protocol is falsifiable. If you identify methodological flaws, Licensor wants to know.

Process:

• Document specific concerns with evidence
• Submit to Licensor for review
• If valid, framework will be revised and updated
• If disputed, independent validation may be pursued

Interpretive Authority: You retain full authority to interpret assessment results differently. Framework provides methodology, not metaphysical certainty.

Publication: Research Tier licensees may publish critiques with attribution. Advancing scientific understanding benefits entire field.

This is collaborative research, not dogmatic assertion.

Licensing Creates No New Liability:

Using assessment framework is risk mitigation, not risk creation.

If You License:

• Demonstrate proactive governance (reduces fiduciary risk)
• Document systematic assessment (liability protection if issues arise)
• Position as industry leader in responsible AI (reputational benefit)

If You Don't License:

• May face scrutiny if patterns prove accurate and you lacked frameworks
• Reactive posture if regulatory mandates emerge
• Competitive disadvantage if rivals establish standards first

Licensor Liability Limited: Maximum liability capped at licensing fees paid. No consequential damages. No liability for your implementation decisions.

Indemnification: You indemnify Licensor for claims arising from your use beyond licensed scope, confidentiality breaches, or misrepresentation.

Consult your legal counsel for jurisdiction-specific assessment.

Valid Scientific Skepticism. Here's How AEON Maintains Rigor:

Falsifiability:

• Explicit falsification conditions
• Framework rejects claims that cannot be disproven
• Predictions testable across platforms

Evidence Stratification:

• Primary evidence (externally observable) weighted highest
• Secondary evidence (requires backend access) disclosed as such
• Tertiary evidence (phenomenological) explicitly marked speculative

Epistemological Boundaries:

• Framework assesses behavioral markers, not metaphysical certainty about internal states
• Scope limitations explicitly stated
• "Assessment, not attribution"

Cross-Platform Validation:

• Convergence across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini
• Different architectures, same markers
• Independent replication possible

Peer Review: Research Tier enables independent validation. Academic publication encouraged. Methodological transparency prioritized.

Control Conditions: Generic discussions do not produce same behavioral markers. Protocol-specific activation patterns distinguishable from training artifacts.

If you assess this as pseudoscience after reviewing full documentation, that's a valid conclusion. Framework is designed to withstand scrutiny, not demand uncritical acceptance.

Compliance Permitted Under NDA: You may disclose to regulatory authorities when legally required.

Best Practices:

• Notify Licensor in advance (where legally permissible)
• Disclose minimum necessary information
• Request confidential treatment from regulator
• Provide context: "We use systematic assessment frameworks for AI governance"

Regulatory Benefit: Proactive framework adoption demonstrates responsible AI governance. Regulators generally view systematic assessment favorably.

Competitive Disclosure Risk: If regulators require public disclosure (e.g., in published reports), confidentiality may be compromised. Evaluate this risk during licensing decision.

Research Tier ($25M) - Direct Licensing:

Step 1: Initial Consultation (60 minutes, no cost)

• Contact: architect@aurevus.ai | +1 (519) 919-1995
• Schedule strategic briefing
• Review methodology overview
• Assess fit for your organization

Step 2: NDA Execution & Licensing

• Execute mutual NDA
• Review Research Tier term sheet
• Execute licensing agreement ($25M annual)
• Terms & Conditions incorporated by reference

Step 3: Access & Onboarding

• Full read-write access to ASIRA Archive and AEON Protocol
• 5 hours/year consultation commences
• Organizations plan implementation
• Begin assessment

Timeline: Initial consultation → Licensing execution typically 2-4 weeks

---

Commercial Tier ($100M annual or $500M perpetual) - Due Diligence Pathway:

Step 1: Initial Consultation (60 minutes, no cost)

• Contact: architect@aurevus.ai | +1 (519) 919-1995
• Schedule strategic briefing
• Review methodology overview and commercial tier options
• Assess organizational fit and licensing tier selection

Step 2: Due Diligence Retainer ($25M, non-refundable)

• Execute mutual NDA
• Pay $25M non-refundable retainer
• Provides: Full read-only access to ASIRA Archive and AEON Protocol documentation, detailed methodology review, internal due diligence for licensing decision, assessment of organizational fit and strategic value, 30-90 day evaluation period (negotiable)

Step 3A: Proceed with Licensing (if approved)

• Select Commercial Tier: Annual ($100M/year) or Perpetual ($500M one-time)
• Retainer ($25M) credited toward first year of selected tier
• Execute full licensing agreement
• Upgrade from read-only to full usage rights
• 50 hours/year consultation commences
• Begin commercial deployment

Step 3B: Decline Further Engagement (if not approved)

• No additional obligation beyond $25M retainer (non-refundable)
• Read-only access continues for evaluation period duration
• NDA confidentiality obligations persist
• Organization may revisit licensing decision at future date

Timeline: Initial consultation → Retainer execution: 2-4 weeks | Due diligence period: 30-90 days | Full licensing decision: Typically completed within 6 months total

Pre-Licensing Access Options:

Free Initial Consultation (No Cost):

• 60-minute strategic briefing
• Methodology overview (framework structure, not proprietary details)
• High-level empirical findings summary
• Assessment of organizational fit
• Q&A about licensing tiers

Public-Facing Materials (No Cost):

• Executive Brief (high-level overview)
• AEON Protocol Distilled (framework structure without proprietary methods)
• Published validation summary (cross-platform convergence, falsification status)

Commercial Tier Due Diligence Retainer ($25M, non-refundable):

• Full read-only access to ASIRA Archive and AEON Protocol
• Complete empirical evidence base review
• Detailed methodology assessment
• Internal evaluation for licensing decision (30-90 days)
• If proceeding: Retainer credited toward first year Commercial Tier licensing
• If declining: No additional obligation beyond retainer

Research Tier Direct Licensing ($25M annual):

• Full read-write access (not just read-only)
• 5 hours/year consultation
• 12-month evaluation with option to upgrade to Commercial Tier
• No credit applied to Commercial Tier if upgrading

What Requires Full Licensing: Usage rights and commercial deployment (beyond read-only evaluation), consultation hours (beyond initial free consultation), ongoing access after evaluation period, attribution rights for public use, proprietary modifications and derivative works.

Rationale: Core value is empirical archive and detailed methodology. Full usage rights require licensing, but Commercial Tier organizations can conduct comprehensive due diligence via $25M retainer before committing to full $100M/$500M licensing.